Oscillating Brane Dark Matter Theory

The Cosmic Yoyo Theory - The Universe as a Vibrating Membrane

Disclaimer

Theoretical Foundations of Oscillating Brane Dark Matter - Part 1

Executive Summary

This document provides a rigorous mathematical foundation for the oscillating brane dark matter theory, addressing key criticisms and establishing its viability as a competitive cosmological model. We demonstrate compatibility with general relativity and quantum mechanics, provide detailed observational confrontations, and present testable predictions that distinguish our model from ΛCDM and MOND.

1. Mathematical Framework and Internal Consistency

1.1 Fundamental Postulates

The theory postulates that dark matter emerges from oscillations in an extra dimension—specifically, dynamic fluctuations of the 3-brane on which our universe is embedded. This is grounded in established brane cosmology frameworks:

Extension of Randall-Sundrum Model: We extend the RS framework to include dynamic brane fluctuations:

\[S = \int d^5x \sqrt{-g_5} \left[ \frac{M_5^3}{2} R_5 - \Lambda_5 \right] + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g_4} \left[ \frac{M_P^2}{2} R_4 - \tau(t,\vec{x}) + \mathcal{L}_\text{matter} \right]\]

where:

  • $M_5$ is the 5D Planck mass
  • $\Lambda_5$ is the bulk cosmological constant
  • $\tau(t,\vec{x})$ is the dynamic brane tension
  • $\mathcal{L}_\text{matter}$ includes all Standard Model fields

1.2 The Radion Field

Brane oscillations are described by a scalar field φ(x) representing the brane’s position in the extra dimension:

\[\tau(t,\vec{x}) = \tau_0 + \delta\tau \cos(\omega t + \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x})\]

where oscillations satisfy the Klein-Gordon equation in the bulk:

\[\Box_5 \phi + m_\phi^2 \phi = 0\]

The effective 4D action after integrating out the extra dimension:

\[S_\text{eff} = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \left[ \frac{M_P^2}{2} R + \frac{1}{2} (\partial \phi)^2 - V(\phi) + \phi T_\mu^\mu \right]\]

1.3 Gravitational Effects

The oscillating brane induces an effective energy-momentum tensor:

\[T_\mu\nu^\text{osc} = \frac{\tau_0 f_\text{osc}}{M_P^2} \left[ g_\mu\nu - \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu \phi \partial_\nu \phi \right]\]

This mimics cold dark matter with:

  • Zero pressure in the averaged limit
  • Energy density $\rho_\text{eff} = \tau_0 f_\text{osc} / R_H$
  • Clustering properties similar to CDM

1.4 Stability Mechanisms

To ensure stability and prevent runaway oscillations, we implement a Goldberger-Wise mechanism:

\[V(\phi) = \lambda \left( \phi^2 - v^2 \right)^2\]

This stabilizes the radion with mass:

\[m_\phi = 2\lambda v \approx \frac{1}{\text{eV}} \times \left(\frac{L}{0.2\,\mu\text{m}}\right)^{-1}\]

2. Compatibility with General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

2.1 Classical Regime (Solar System Tests)

The model must reproduce all GR successes. We ensure this by:

Suppression at High Densities: The oscillation amplitude is environmentally dependent:

\[A_\text{osc}(r) = A_0 \exp\left(-\frac{\rho_\text{local}}{\rho_\text{crit}}\right)\]

where $\rho_\text{crit} \sim 10^{-26}$ kg/m³ (galactic density scale).

This ensures:

  • Negligible effects in the Solar System ($\rho \gg \rho_\text{crit}$)

Mercury Perihelion Precession: The additional precession from brane oscillations:

\[\delta\dot{\omega} = \frac{3n}{2} \frac{A_\text{osc}^2 \omega_0^2 r_\text{Merc}^2}{c^2} \sin(2\omega_0 t)\]

where $n$ is Mercury’s mean motion. For Solar System density:

\[A_\text{osc}(\text{Solar System}) = A_0 \exp\left(-\frac{\rho_\odot}{\rho_\text{crit}}\right) < 10^{-12}\]

This yields: \(\delta\dot{\omega} < 0.01 \text{ arcsec/century}\)

compared to GR’s prediction of 42.98 arcsec/century (observed: 42.98 ± 0.04).

Light Deflection: The oscillation contribution to deflection angle: \(\delta\alpha = \frac{4GM_\odot}{c^2 b} \times \frac{A_\text{osc}^2}{2} < 10^{-9} \alpha_\text{GR}\)

where $b$ is the impact parameter and $\alpha_\text{GR} = 1.75$ arcsec for grazing rays.

Gravitational Redshift: Unaffected as the time-averaged metric remains unchanged

Fifth Force Constraints: Any scalar-mediated force is suppressed by:

\[\alpha = \frac{\phi M_P}{M_5^2} < 10^{-5}\]

satisfying Eöt-Wash experiments.

2.2 Quantum Regime

Particle Content: Oscillation quanta (branons) have:

  • Mass: $m_\text{branon} \sim 1$ eV
  • Coupling to SM: gravitational only
  • Production rate: negligible at collider energies

Quantum Stability: The effective potential prevents cascading:

\[\Gamma_\text{decay} \sim \frac{m_\phi^5}{M_5^6} < H_0\]

ensuring cosmological stability.

Loop Corrections: One-loop corrections to the brane tension:

\[\delta\tau_\text{1-loop} = \frac{N_\text{KK} m_\text{KK}^4}{64\pi^2} \ln\left(\frac{\Lambda_\text{UV}}{m_\text{KK}}\right)\]

remain small for $\Lambda_\text{UV} \lesssim M_5$.

3. Observational Confrontations

3.1 CMB Anisotropies (Planck Constraints)

The model must reproduce Planck’s precision measurements:

Acoustic Peaks: The effective dark matter density at recombination:

\[\Omega_\text{osc}(z_\text{rec}) = \Omega_\text{CDM} = 0.258 \pm 0.011\]

Angular Power Spectrum: Modifications to the standard $C_\ell$:

\[\frac{\Delta C_\ell}{C_\ell} < 10^{-3} \text{ for } \ell < 2000\]

achieved by ensuring adiabatic initial conditions.

Spectral Index: No modification to primordial spectrum:

\(n_s = 0.9649 \pm 0.0042\) (Planck value)

3.2 Galaxy Rotation Curves

The brane oscillation creates an effective potential:

\[\Phi_\text{eff}(r) = \Phi_\text{baryon}(r) + \Phi_\text{osc}(r)\]

where:

\[\Phi_\text{osc}(r) = -\frac{GM_\text{osc}}{r} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r}{r_s}\right)\right]\]

with scale radius $r_s \sim 10$ kpc, naturally explaining flat rotation curves.

Tully-Fisher Relation: The model predicts:

\[v_\text{flat}^4 = G M_\text{baryon} a_0\]

with $a_0 = cH_0/2\pi \times 1.05 = 1.1 \times 10^{-10}$ m/s².

3.3 Gravitational Lensing

Galaxy Clusters: The effective surface density:

\[\Sigma_\text{eff} = \Sigma_\text{baryon} + \Sigma_\text{osc}\]

where $\Sigma_\text{osc}$ follows the baryon distribution with enhancement factor ~5-6.

Bullet Cluster: During collision:

The Bullet Cluster (1E 0657-56) provides a crucial test. In our model:

  1. Initial State: Two clusters approaching with relative velocity ~4700 km/s
    • Each has oscillation field proportional to baryon distribution
    • Gas dominates baryonic mass (~90%)
  2. During Collision (t = 0):
    • Gas experiences ram pressure: $P_\text{ram} = \rho_\text{gas} v_\text{rel}^2$
    • Deceleration: $a_\text{gas} = -P_\text{ram}/(\rho_\text{gas} \ell_\text{shock})$
    • Oscillation field passes through unimpeded (no self-interaction)
  3. Post-Collision (t > 100 Myr):
    • Gas lags behind by $\Delta x \sim 150$ kpc
    • Galaxies maintain velocity (collisionless)
    • Oscillation field remains centered on galaxies
  4. Observational Signature: \(\kappa_\text{lensing}(x) = \kappa_\text{galaxies}(x) + \kappa_\text{osc}(x) \neq \kappa_\text{gas}(x)\)

The mass centroid from weak lensing follows the oscillation field (centered on galaxies), while X-ray emission traces the shocked gas - exactly as observed. This provides a natural explanation without particle dark matter.

3.4 Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav)

Stochastic Background: Brane transitions can produce:

\[\Omega_\text{GW}(f) = \Omega_0 \left(\frac{f}{f_*}\right)^{n_t}\]

with:

  • $f_* \sim 10^{-8}$ Hz (transition frequency)
  • $n_t = 2/3$ (phase transition spectrum)
  • $\Omega_0 \sim 10^{-9}$ (compatible with NANOGrav)

Unique Signature: Coherent oscillations produce a doublet:

  • Primary: $f_0 = 1/T = 1.6 \times 10^{-17}$ Hz
  • Echo: $2f_0$ from flux reversal